Sunday, April 25, 2010
Frightened About Facebook
Is Facebook affecting the way our generation communicates? That’s what this topic really makes me think about. I just talked in the last paragraph about texting and Facebooking my friends. Never about actually calling them. And thinking about it now I know I probably wouldn’t ever call my friends because I’m so set on the technology of online communicating. That’s so…SAD! I’m sure I’m not the only one out there that’s completely set with texting or Facebooking. Is this going to have a major effect on kids of the future? I already find it startling how young kids are getting cell phones. I didn’t get one til the 8th grade! Even then it was only for emergencies. I have cousins that are in like the 5th grade asking for one. They’re going to learn to text and stuff at an incredibly early age. What kind of social skills are they going to have in one-on-one communication then?
Facebook is unfortunately an essential part of my day that I don’t think I could be without. Realizing this now…it makes me wonder about the future of communication. Well I gotta go update my Facebook status about this! Toodles!
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Duur...So dumb...can't work keyboard...
I think the greater thing that needs to be addressed is how the technology is used in the classroom. When professors assign readings on the computer, students do their normal thing and skim it. This is what makes us dumb? If a professor assigned a book reading I’m sure the students would do the same thing! Have students not always done that? Maybe this is just a sign of change and teachers need to adapt to this sort of new process. I know this is a far stretch and many would criticize this idea, but the world evolves. Can teaching not evolve as well? Technology could be an excellent tool if used properly. I brought up the point in class how at my high school students were more likely to participate when using the smartboards. Another student made a comment along the lines of, “Sort of like the chalkboards, eh?” I understand that we technically already have the ability to contribute in class, but using technology makes it so much more interesting! Plus, with things advancing as they do, who knows the future technologies that could be created to further the interactivity in classrooms. I know in the classes that are all lecture I’m more likely to day dream and not pay attention. Classes that are more interactive grab my attention more. Therefore I think the use of technology in classes at least actually improves the learning environment. That is…as long as the professors know how to use it.
Overall I completely disagree with Mark Bauerlein. My generation is not dumb. We’ve simply become a new type of “smart”. Toodles.
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Is Google a Verb Now?
When I check out other search engines, I question the credibility of their results. Have they been paid off to put certain sites at the top? At least with Google I’m a little more familiar with how their results are put together. Plus, it being such a well known site makes me feel a little more secure if I ever use it to research.
One problem I can foresee with a giant company like Google is the change in future generations research patterns. I mean this sort of thing is already having an effect. When I have to look up sources for paper I can easily Google what I’m looking for. However, I was taught the conventional way of going to the library and researching too. I wonder if farther down the lines students won’t even know how to do this. What’s the point when you have something like Google that can bring the sources to you right on your computer without having to go?
Another problem that could occur is with practically no competition, Google monopolizes a lot of options. Small companies couldn’t even dream of competing with them. The closest they have to competition is Bing. Also we’re seeing Google branch out to other things besides just being a search engine. With such power it could practically put out a lot of companies in whatever it tries I think.
Overall, I think having such a dominant company isn’t such a great thing. Yeah it’s not going to exactly harm us, but it does limit us in options. If Google had competition, the two companies would probably try a lot harder to outdo each other. Thus creating even more spectacular options! Think of the possibilities. Toodles!
Thursday, April 8, 2010
The Real Internet Use In College
Off to attempt actually reading now...toodles.
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Not Kottke
After reading over Rebecca Blood’s interview with blogger Jason Kottke, I was left with a sour taste in my mouth. I was not overly impressed with the site to say the least. Kottke’s blog, kottke.org, seems to me to be a rather plain and boring blog with links. Looking at many other blogs of today’s time, this seems to be a common theme. This is why I am unable to understand why Kottke’s is so successful. It was rated number 53 on Technorati (that was back in 2006. I checked when writing this blog and it was down to number118). After going to his site I found a plain format and small posts. Nothing out of the ordinary to make me particularly want to read it over other sites I have found with some of the same links and better writing.
Kottke mentions in the interview that he does not like writing. Why on earth would you become a blogger then? He was previously a graphic designer so I wonder why he got into blogging. I guess finding interesting links could be an entertaining hobby, but I could not see making a career out of it. Especially since he says he does not even think of writing more than four paragraphs anymore. I guess it is all in opinion on what someone thinks of a blog. I feel like there should be more written then just a few lines on a subject. Kottke is more content with just posting a couple phrases and a link or video. He does occasionally post topics to spur discussion. In the interview he speaks a lot about tweaking the site and its technical aspects. I wonder why he did not go into web design instead of blogging.
I did find it interesting to learn that he met his wife through blogging. Also, his comparison between his wife and his style was intriguing. He saw himself as being more popular involving his actual blog where as his wife, Meg Hourihan, has more public speaking and whatnot appeal.
The positive aspects I found of his blog were the wide range of topics, constant updating, and easy understanding of the layout of the site. I am not a fan of the single topic blogs. Whether they are gossip pages, political pages, or any other one track site; I am more interested to find a large variety of topics. Kottke does this in his blog. Also he updates the site multiple times a day so visitors can find new links throughout the day. I particularly like this because some of my favorite sites take days before new material is up. Lastly, I find his layout to be easy to maneuver through. Then again, it is somewhat difficult to make a blog difficult to navigate.
Well that just about wraps up my feelings about Kottke. I hate to be negative in any way, but I felt the site was in need of a critique! Until next topic…toodles.